DMTF and OMG announce partnership
The Distributed Management Task Force and the Object Management Group will be collaborating to platform the DMTF standards on the OMG's metamodels.
http://www.dmtf.org/newsroom/releases/2004_12_13
This is big news, for those of you following this space. This is the clearest roadmap yet to a CMDB standard, and may well render the DCML effort moot.

Why is this the clearest roadmap to a CMDB standard? Looking at both it looks fairly simple to accomplish the same things. Is this simply because you seem to prefer UML? or have a thing against RDF? Take a server and try to map it out in both. I see some things "apparently" missing in DMTF. Or perhaps I just don't know their intent. Model an ILO or DRAC card in a server using that system. Or a set of blade servers.... DCML (from what I've seen / played with) handles those cases fine. Although I do have to admit...I like the UML format and kinda wish that DCML had gone with something like that.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | January 29, 2005 at 02:18 PM
Definitely have a thing against RDF. I've just been through the relational/object-oriented wars and don't see the need for another low level data management standard for solving problems like this. CMDBs are not an AI problem, they are a basic data/class modeling problem. RDF is WAY overkill.
Posted by: Charlie | January 29, 2005 at 03:20 PM